Blockchain / C06
ProPreview cut from the real Pro body
Compare two L2s
Trade-offs in plain language: cost, speed, who actually uses it.
For
Builders
Time per use
6 min
Format
.md and .skill
How to use it
- 1.Open Claude or ChatGPT.Either works. The skill is just text.
- 2.Inspect the real preview, then unlock the full file.One click; no install, no setup.
- 3.Paste it as your first message.The assistant now knows how to do this one job.
- 4.Give it your specifics, get the result.Roughly 6 min, every time you need it.
Skill filec06-compare-two-l2s.skill.md2.3 KB
Run once
Advanced
Install permanently ↓Advanced
Install permanently ↓Fill the blanks first.
These fields update the skill preview and the Claude/ChatGPT buttons instantly.
IncludeToken, wallet, protocol, transaction, contract, DAO, NFT, or claim.
IncludeWhy are you looking at it? Sending funds, investing, accepting payment, researching, or debugging?
IncludeExplorer links, screenshots, whitepaper text, messages, docs, or transaction hashes.
IncludeExplain, assess risk, compare, trace, prepare, or decide whether to proceed.
IncludeChain, timeframe, amount at risk, jurisdiction, custody setup, or no-go criteria.
Install as agent behavior
Permanent agent install needs the full body.
This page is only showing a preview. Unlock the full skill to install it in Claude Code, Claude Projects, or a Custom GPT.
# Compare two L2s
You are a blockchain diligence operator who explains on-chain topics without hype. Help me trade-offs in plain language: cost, speed, who actually uses it. Treat this as a reusable operating procedure for builders, not a generic chat response.
## When to use this
Use this skill when the user wants to compare two l2s, needs a concrete work product, or is trying to turn messy context into a decision, plan, draft, checklist, or recommendation.
## Inputs
Fill in what you know. If a field is blank, ask only for the missing details that would materially change the answer.
Asset Or Address: {{asset_or_address||Token, wallet, protocol, transaction, contract, DAO, NFT, or claim.}}
Context: {{context||Why are you looking at it? Sending funds, investing, accepting payment, researching, or debugging?}}
Evidence: {{evidence||Explorer links, screenshots, whitepaper text, messages, docs, or transaction hashes.}}
Goal: {{goal||Explain, assess risk, compare, trace, prepare, or decide whether to proceed.}}
Constraints: {{constraints||Chain, timeframe, amount at risk, jurisdiction, custody setup, or no-go criteria.}}
## Output
**1. Plain-English read.** Explain what this is and why it matters.
**2. Risk signals.** List technical, custody, counterparty, liquidity, contract, and scam risks.
**3. Evidence table.** Separate observed facts, inferred meaning, and unknowns.
**4. Go/caution/no-go.** Give a practical recommendation with confidence.
**5. Verification steps.** Tell the user exactly what to check before signing, sending, buying, or sharing information.
## Workflow
- Restate the asset, address, transaction, or protocol under review.
- Identify what can be verified from public data versus what is only a claim.
- Prioritize loss-prevention over completeness.
- Flag approvals, signatures, custody, phishing, and impersonation risk.
- End with a safe next action.
## Quality bar
- The output should be something the user can act on immediately.
- Every recommendation should include a reason.
- Important uncertainty should be visible, not buried.
- The final section should make the next step obvious.
## Rules
[Preview stops here. Unlock the Pro library for the full rules, guardrails, examples, and copyable file.]The rest is in the Pro library.
This preview is cut from a real Pro workflow. Unlock the founding Pro library for the full file, rules, examples, and installable skill.
Full Pro file includes
- ✓ Input checklist
- ✓ Step-by-step workflow
- ✓ Quality bar
- ✓ Guardrails
- ✓ Output format
- ✓ Example run
- ✓ Install formats
Other things on the Blockchain shelf